Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robbie Marriage's avatar

This is fantastic buddy.

I'm going to go back and read the first one too. I somehow missed it. I don't know very much about the history of this game, so I like reading all this stuff to help fill me in a little bit.

I don't know if this is the forum for it, but I would love to suggest something to do with the final playoff spot in 2017 for a topic in this series. As we know in real life, a completely undeserving Alabama team got in there, and became probably the least deserving national champion in history. Notice I did not say worse. I know very well what players were on that team, but in a college football sense of the word 'deserve,' Alabama did not need to be in that tournament.

As we all know, the battle for that fourth playoff spot in 2017 was kind of everybody against everybody, who all had interlocking winning arguments against each other. Wisconsin was number one in the country, but lost their conference championship game to Ohio State, who was beaten by Oklahoma, who had an even weaker schedule than UCF, who had that dirty word 'American' beside their names, but who also had just as many top 25 wins as many of these other teams.

Out of all these teams, the committee decided to spit in the face of the fans and everybody else by putting in the team with the fewest top 25 wins of anybody (according to computer rankings, because the committee never at any point has earned any trust for themselves when it comes to being real about the SEC), Alabama. Whether or not they won the tournament is immaterial. This was such a bad job that these geniuses on the committee managed to create the one thing they wanted to avoid, a split national championship with UCF.

It's got little to do with UCF. It's got everything to do with that the power five basically has no undisputed champion in 2017. Alabama won a tournament at the end of the season. Big whoop. What about Wisconsin, and yes, even UCF, both of whom were more qualified than Alabama in my opinion, on account of none of them having a multiple possession loss while Alabama did (we know how I feel about multiple possession losses), but neither of whom were granted entry to this tournament that Alabama won?

I suppose my proposed alteration is what if the committee showed they were actually willing to put in a deserving group of five team? Deserving G5 teams are rare, but they do come along every so often, and what if the committee showed they were willing to actually respect the play on the field and put them in? It would be much less about on the field stuff, and much more about conference realignment changes and playoff format changes. If the committee showed that a deserving G5 team could actually make the playoffs, we could be without a lot of the nonsense we have today.

There would be no need for automatic G5 bids for anything, a slightly less desperate rush to get out of the G5 around the end of this decade, and etc.. Perhaps you can't foresee that anything would change, at which point you obviously can't publish an article about it, but I think it could've set a good precedent that if you're a G5 team with a good schedule (UCF wound up in the late 50s-early 60s in terms of SOS on most computer rankings, more difficult than most teams in a weak Big 12 in 2017) and go undefeated, you can make it. That would've been good for the game.

At the very least, even if there is no significant butterfly effect, letting UCF into the tournament would've at least been likely to expunge their 2017 national championship from the record books, which most SEC hardliners may like even more than another Alabama national championship, so they played themselves on that one.

Expand full comment
Colin Cerniglia's avatar

No Penn State natty in the alternate world either 😩

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts