Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Robbie Marriage's avatar

All of these rematches do make me ache for the days of divisions a little bit. I don't know why in 13 regular season games (if all this buzz about Alabama over SMU if they lose is correct, then conference championships are nothing more than regular season games) that two of them have to be the same, but I guess this is what we've got now, and we have to deal with it.

One hypothetical Griffin. Let's use your rankings for this, because I know the real committee is hopelessly biased against the G5. You say that the MWC championship game is a playoff play-in, but is it? I'm not quite sure I'd go that far. It absolutely is for UNLV, but let's say Boise loses a barn burner. That would leave them with two one-score losses against No. 1 Oregon and likely a 13-15 UNLV, in a fight for the last playoff spot with South Carolina, who has a loss to a ranked only by default LSU, and a humiliation against Mississippi.

Once again, the real committee would never ever allow Boise to win a fight over Alabama, because ESPN wouldn't allow it, but where we're living and actual performance matters a bit more, we've talked a lot about my aversion to multiple possession losses. I would still take Boise to my playoff over South Carolina, even in the event of a loss, on the condition that it's close, and on the condition that this fight doesn't get muddled by including SMU in it also.

If that fight were between Boise and Alabama or Miami (neither of whom have any multiple possession losses) it could be a different story, but I'm not here to debate that ranking. I just think that there may possibly be a circumstance where Boise could be in even with a loss, in our Substack world that is not corrupted by powerful TV networks.

Expand full comment
Colin Cerniglia's avatar

Thanks for the shoutout, friend!

Expand full comment

No posts